Nick Leeson swap hedging

Discussion in 'Ask any question!' started by shubd, Jun 12, 2017.

  1. shubd

    shubd New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2017
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello! I have a school assignment on the Barings case, but I don't know much about anything related to financial market.

    The question I can't really figure out is this one: Would it be interesting for Leeson to hedge himself with swaps?

    I don't know if I relate swaps to account 88888 or to the Nikkei index falling... And I don't what kind of swaps I should mention either. If anyone could help...
     
  2. StockJock-e

    StockJock-e Brew Master
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2016
    Messages:
    9,546
    Likes Received:
    3,544
    For those wondering what this is about:

    source: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/ebf301/node/569

    In February, 1995, Nick Leeson, a “rogue” trader for Barings Bank, UK, single-handedly caused the financial collapse of a bank that had been in existence for hundreds of years. In fact, Barings had financed the Louisiana Purchase between the US and France in 1803. Leeson was dealing in risky financial derivatives in the Singapore office of Barings. He was the lone trader there and was betting heavily on options for both the Singapore (SIPEX) and Nikkei exchange indexes. These are similar to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and the S&P500 indexes here in the US.

    In the early 90s, Barings decided to get into the expanding futures/options business in Asia. They established a Tokyo office to begin trading on the Tokyo Exchange. Later, they would look to open a Singapore office for trading on the SIMEX. Leeson requested to set-up the accounting and settlement functions there and direct trading floor operations (different from trading). The London office granted his request and he went to Singapore in April, 1992. Initially, he could only execute trades on behalf of clients and the Tokyo office for "arbitrage" (Lesson 10) purposes. After a good deal of success in this area, he was allowed to pursue an official trading license on the SIMEX. He was then given some "discretion" in his executions meaning; he could place orders on his own (speculative, or "proprietary" trading).

    Even after given the right to trade, Leeson still supervised accounting and settlements. And there was no direct oversight of his "book" and he even set-up a "dummy" account in which to funnel losing trades. So, as far as the London office of Barings was concerned, he was always making money because they never saw the losses and rarely questioned his request for funds to cover his "margin calls" (Lesson 3). He took on huge positions as the market seemed to "go his way." He also "wrote" options, taking-on huge risk (Lesson 10).

    He was, in fact, perpetuating a "hoax" in his record-keeping to hide losses. He would set the prices put into the accounting system and "cross-trade" between the legitimate, internal, accounts and his fictitious "88888" account. He would also record trades that were never executed on the Exchange.

    In January, 1995, a huge earthquake hit Japan, sending its financial markets reeling. The Nikkei crashed, which adversely affected Leeson's position (remember, he had been selling Options). It was only then that he tried to hedge his postions, but it was too late. By late February, he faxed a letter of resignation, and when his position was discovered, he had lost ($1.4 billion USD). Barings, the bank which financed the Louisiana Purchase between the US and France, became insolvent and was sold to a competing bank for $1.00!
     
  3. StockJock-e

    StockJock-e Brew Master
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2016
    Messages:
    9,546
    Likes Received:
    3,544
    Im not sure we understand the question, maybe bad translation from google translate.

    You what language do you speak?
     
  4. shubd

    shubd New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2017
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    I speak english, hehe... And, bizarrely enough, that's really the question. I think this is what my teacher means: Would it be interesting for Leeson to use swaps as a hedging tool in all or some of the actions he took?

    Now, interesting in what aspect? I suppose the intention would be to recover the losses faster or maybe not to lose the amount he did in the first place.
     
  5. StockJock-e

    StockJock-e Brew Master
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2016
    Messages:
    9,546
    Likes Received:
    3,544
    Would it be interesting?

    Yes.

    There, you passed the course! :D

    I guess the teacher wants you to research what swaps are, then explain how using them could have saved the bank.
     
    Stockaholic likes this.
  6. shubd

    shubd New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2017
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, thanks!

    Just one last question, to see if I'm on the right track: The swaps would've been used related to the Nikkei index, since what he did with the 88888 account was speculating - the opposite of hedging. Am I correct?
     

Share This Page